Tuesday, October 22, 2013

Common Ground: A Metta Application


Common Ground: A Metta Application from Christine Rosakranse on Vimeo.

Welcome to Common Ground: A Metta Compassion Application.
MIrroring traditional methods for engendering compassion, we have designed an application that facilitates a practice that increases the amount of loving-kindness we have not only for ourselves, but for our friends, acquaintances, and even strangers.
Designed with four distinct learning phases that elicit compassionate responses, the application grows your compassion feelings outward in ever expanding spheres of connection.
You start with thinking about close friends, and how they make you feel loving and kind. Repeating like me, they want to be happy, like me they want to be free from suffering, and then finally writing in your own like me....entry, you gradual are able to call up that compassionate feeling more automatically. At the second stage you repeat these lines but while thinking about acquaintances, ending by writing your own like me for that person.
After completing compassion practices for a given group, you will see a wall with your like me response combined with the responses of others using the system.
Here we see the coming together of various voices from all over the internet, united by compassion. For your continuing practice, another layer will unlock, focusing on selfcompassion and finally, compassion for “enemies”.

Please vote for us on http://www.facebook.com/stanfordccare/app_336815736453308
for CCARE's Tech and Compassion Contest. Deadline for voting is October 25th, 2013.

Monday, October 14, 2013

Harm Reduction in Social Networking

A term that is already known and used by psychiatrists, social works, and other health care practitioners  and one that I find useful when talking about social networking is "harm reduction." The basic definition is relatively easy to understand.  People who engage in certain inherently "dangerous" (either to physical well-being or mental well-being) activities may not want to stop.  For medical professionals, these activities may include intravenous drug use or certain sexual practices.   From a harm reduction perspective, if people are going to engage in these dangerous activities it would be prudent to reduce the amount of harm that these activities cause.  For intravenous drug use, this would mean having a safe needle exchange program.  For sexual practices, this might mean providing sex education and making condoms readily available.
In an analogous manner, the ethos of harm reduction would outline a similar approach for those suffering from the ill effects of chronic social networking use or internet addiction.  The bottom line is that people are going to use the internet and social networking sites, but the ever-growing body of literature pertaining to the pernicious effects of chronic use affords us an opportunity to reduce the harm this use may cause.
For example, studies show a correlation between social networking use and lower levels of self-esteem (in tweens, Nass & Pea, 2010).  This correlation was mitigated by face-to-face contact.  The harm reduction model for counteracting FOMO (fear of missing out), skewed social perceptions (everyone is happy on Facebook), and the like may be insisting on a certain amount of face-to-face contact.
Other interventions may involve education as to the negatives of internet use, motivating a voluntary stoppage or restraint on use.  One of the richest areas for this sort of education is reaching out to children, either in school or at home because the possible negative effects are most influential on the developing mind.
With the scientific evidence mounting, we now have a clear path to reducing the amount of harm induced by chronic social networking.  The key is to get this research into the hands of designers and developers so they can implement a new way of thinking that cares for the user's psychological well-being by way of harm reduction.